from MPW - Pricing News http://ift.tt/1y6oaMz
via IFTTT
Today, the Data and Analytics division of Black Knight Financial Services released its latest Home Price Index (HPI) report, based on October 2014 residential real estate transactions. The Black Knight HPI combines the Company’s extensive property and loan-level databases to produce a repeat sales analysis of home prices as of their transaction dates every month for each of more than 18,500 U.S. ZIP codes. The Black Knight HPI represents the price of non-distressed sales by taking into account price discounts for REO and short sales.
Month | YoY House Price Increase |
---|---|
Jan-13 | 6.7% |
Feb-13 | 7.3% |
Mar-13 | 7.6% |
Apr-13 | 8.1% |
May-13 | 7.9% |
Jun-13 | 8.4% |
Jul-13 | 8.7% |
Aug-13 | 9.0% |
Sep-13 | 9.0% |
Oct-13 | 8.8% |
Nov-13 | 8.5% |
Dec-13 | 8.4% |
Jan-14 | 8.0% |
Feb-14 | 7.6% |
Mar-14 | 7.0% |
Apr-14 | 6.4% |
May-14 | 5.9% |
June-14 | 5.5% |
July-14 | 5.1% |
Aug-14 | 4.9% |
Sep-14 | 4.6% |
Oct-14 | 4.5% |
[In 20004] Patient" lasted for two meetings before being replaced by "measured." This is fairly consistent with my expectations. My baseline scenario is that the Fed drops "considerable" entirely in January, retains "patient" in March, drops "patient" in April, and raise rates in June.
...
Bottom Line: Assuming the data holds, maybe history will repeat itself.
The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City released the December Manufacturing Survey today. According to Chad Wilkerson, vice president and economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, the survey revealed that Tenth District manufacturing activity continued to expand at a moderate pace in December, and producers’ expectations for future activity remained at solid levels.
“This month’s results are similar to what we’ve seen most of the year, said Wilkerson. The main change in December, which we started to see in November, is that input price pressures have come down.”
The month-over-month composite index was 8 in December, up slightly from 7 in November and 4 in October. The composite index is an average of the production, new orders, employment, supplier delivery time, and raw materials inventory indexes. ... The employment index jumped from 10 to 18, its highest level in nearly two years. ...
Future factory indexes were mostly stable at solid levels. The future composite index was unchanged at 22, while the future shipments, new orders, and employment indexes increased further. The future capital spending index jumped from 15 to 23, its highest level in five months. In contrast, the future production index eased from 34 to 30, and the future order backlog index also inched lower.
emphasis added
All procurement outsourcing deals have two viable sources of return – cutting costs on transaction processing which is achieved soon after implementing the project, and savings through strategic sourcing and category management achieved during the course of the outsourcing contract.
In this guest post, the second in a series, Procurement Leaders invites GEP’s Santosh Reddy to look at factors to consider when outsourcing procurement activities - particularly around understanding return on investment. You can download a whitepaper on the subject here.
In the previous post in this series, we presented why and how a company can evaluate if procurement outsourcing will help them. In this part, let’s look at some ideas on how to measure and generate return on investment (ROI) on a procurement outsourcing deal. While calculating ROI seems like simple math, quantifying the returns generated by an outsourcing deal is difficult.
All procurement outsourcing deals have two viable sources of return – cutting costs on transaction processing which is achieved soon after implementing the project, and savings through strategic sourcing and category management achieved during the course of the outsourcing contract.
To measure the short term return, start by defining all activities that will be outsourced and measuring the time and effort being expended by the current team performing those activities. The result should be a monetized value of time spent on transactional/ tactical activities being outsourced.
While lay-offs were a prominent result of outsourcing deals and meant to generate savings immediately, they are not the case or norm in procurement outsourcing deals. By redeploying current staff, companies are able to take up and complete more initiatives thanks to the additional time available with resources experienced with the job and knowledgeable of company’s culture and people. These long-term savings can be measured as the delta increase in savings from initiatives that this redeployed team achieves.
With a calculation mechanism in place, next step is to ensure the sources start yielding results. This can be achieved using a combination of steps.
Measure the right things, and frequently
Reports are an absolute need for any outsourcing program. They help measure the program’s health, and helps program managers identify risks and negative trends early on. However, not working with the right set of reports could do more harm than good.
The first report all program managers should use is the OTIF – On Time In Full – service report. By definition, it measures percentage activities completed within agreed time and meeting specified service expectations. The tricky part here is to define what ‘On Time’ means, particularly where the support requires constant interaction and waiting for updates between the support team, client and suppliers. The best laid programs typically account for this time and try to measure the client and supplier teams too.
For a transaction outsourcing program, the team’s utilization and efficiency can be measured purely on number of transactions processed. It is made possible because of transactions being fairly standard, define time per transaction and rest is pure math.
However, utilization is not a good measure by itself when measuring anything apart from a transaction support process. For programs that support category management, contract management or sourcing support, not every contract renewal or strategic sourcing initiative is similar to another one. The same project being re-executed might require a different amount of time and effort. So, additional reports should be used. Savings generated by sourcing support or contract management programs, and spend under procurement’s management in a category management program are good indicators of a program’s health.
Know the support team
Outsourcing teams can be a black box at times, with a small helpdesk team doing all the interaction with the client teams. While a helpdesk team is needed for a variety of reasons, one to one relationship between smaller teams within the service provider’s team aligned with client teams will be beneficial. This helps with fostering a healthy working relationship. Risks identified can be addressed quickly and impact is localized.
Utilization is to a good extent directly proportional to the strength of the pairing. This has multiple benefits to both parties involved. For clients, they are working with the same set of 2-3 members, so they never get that black box feeling even if they still have to go through a helpdesk for new projects. Because they have worked together in the past, support team does not have any learning curve about the client’s work style and requirements. From the service provider’s perspective, it will let their team specialize in a certain aspect rather than be a jack of all activities, and help them on their career progression and improved retention.
In summary, an evergreen change management and communication program, frequent and proper reporting and good pairing of teams can bring about early adoption and ROI realization. Program managers from both the client and service provider should focus on measuring and communicating the effectiveness of the outsourcing program.
Santosh Reddy is senior manager, Consulting, at GEP.
You can download a whitepaper ’Procurement Outsourcing: A Field Guide’ produced by Procurement Leaders in association with GEP, here.
Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in October suggests that economic activity is expanding at a moderate pace. Labor market conditions improved further, with solid job gains and a lower unemployment rate. On balance, a range of labor market indicators suggests that underutilization of labor resources continues to diminish. Household spending is rising moderately and business fixed investment is advancing, while the recovery in the housing sector remains slow. Inflation has continued to run below the Committee's longer-run objective, partly reflecting declines in energy prices. Market-based measures of inflation compensation have declined somewhat further; survey-based measures of longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.
Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee expects that, with appropriate policy accommodation, economic activity will expand at a moderate pace, with labor market indicators moving toward levels the Committee judges consistent with its dual mandate. The Committee sees the risks to the outlook for economic activity and the labor market as nearly balanced. The Committee expects inflation to rise gradually toward 2 percent as the labor market improves further and the transitory effects of lower energy prices and other factors dissipate. The Committee continues to monitor inflation developments closely.
To support continued progress toward maximum employment and price stability, the Committee today reaffirmed its view that the current 0 to 1/4 percent target range for the federal funds rate remains appropriate. In determining how long to maintain this target range, the Committee will assess progress--both realized and expected--toward its objectives of maximum employment and 2 percent inflation. This assessment will take into account a wide range of information, including measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and readings on financial developments. Based on its current assessment, the Committee judges that it can be patient in beginning to normalize the stance of monetary policy. The Committee sees this guidance as consistent with its previous statement that it likely will be appropriate to maintain the 0 to 1/4 percent target range for the federal funds rate for a considerable time following the end of its asset purchase program in October, especially if projected inflation continues to run below the Committee's 2 percent longer-run goal, and provided that longer-term inflation expectations remain well anchored. However, if incoming information indicates faster progress toward the Committee's employment and inflation objectives than the Committee now expects, then increases in the target range for the federal funds rate are likely to occur sooner than currently anticipated. Conversely, if progress proves slower than expected, then increases in the target range are likely to occur later than currently anticipated.
The Committee is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction. This policy, by keeping the Committee's holdings of longer-term securities at sizable levels, should help maintain accommodative financial conditions.
When the Committee decides to begin to remove policy accommodation, it will take a balanced approach consistent with its longer-run goals of maximum employment and inflation of 2 percent. The Committee currently anticipates that, even after employment and inflation are near mandate-consistent levels, economic conditions may, for some time, warrant keeping the target federal funds rate below levels the Committee views as normal in the longer run.
Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Janet L. Yellen, Chair; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; Lael Brainard; Stanley Fischer; Loretta J. Mester; Jerome H. Powell; and Daniel K. Tarullo.
Voting against the action were Richard W. Fisher, who believed that, while the Committee should be patient in beginning to normalize monetary policy, improvement in the U.S. economic performance since October has moved forward, further than the majority of the Committee envisions, the date when it will likely be appropriate to increase the federal funds rate; Narayana Kocherlakota, who believed that the Committee's decision, in the context of ongoing low inflation and falling market-based measures of longer-term inflation expectations, created undue downside risk to the credibility of the 2 percent inflation target; and Charles I. Plosser, who believed that the statement should not stress the importance of the passage of time as a key element of its forward guidance and, given the improvement in economic conditions, should not emphasize the consistency of the current forward guidance with previous statements.
emphasis added
The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) declined 0.3 percent in November on a seasonally adjusted basis, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Over the last 12 months, the all items index increased 1.3 percent before seasonal adjustment.
...
The gasoline index posted its sharpest decline since December 2008 and was the main cause of the decrease in the seasonally adjusted all items index. The indexes for fuel oil and natural gas also declined, and the energy index fell 3.8 percent. ...
The index for all items less food and energy increased 0.1 percent in November. ...
The all items index increased 1.3 percent over the last 12 months, a notable decline from the 1.7 percent figure from the 12 months ending October. The index for all items less food and energy has increased 1.7 percent over the last 12 months, compared to 1.8 percent for the 12 months ending October.
emphasis added
With Russia scrambling to contain a currency crisis, the country’s central bank, in a surprise middle-of-the-night move, increased its key interest rate to 17 percent, from 10.5 percent.
...
The rate increase came after the ruble plummeted yet again on Monday, by more than 10 percent, to around 64 per dollar. The ruble has lost nearly half its value this year.
Oil for January delivery fell $1.90, or 3.3%, to close at $55.91 a barrel, the lowest level since May 2009 on the New York Mercantile Exchange.
Brent crude, the global benchmark, slid 1.3% to $61.06 a barrel, the lowest level since July 2009, on ICE Futures Europe.
The economic dataflow has been solid since the October FOMC meeting. ... News on inflation, however, has been mixed. On the one hand, actual inflation measures have firmed a bit since October. But, on the other hand, oil prices have continued to decline and market-implied measures of inflation expectations have dropped further.
We expect modest upgrades to Fed officials’ projections and to the description of growth and the labor market in the FOMC statement, while the inflation forecasts are likely to come down a bit. These expectations for the economic projections would suggest that the “dots” remain broadly unchanged.
We expect the FOMC to modify its “considerable time” forward guidance. One possibility would be to state that the committee will be “patient” in raising the funds rate until it is clear that the economy is on the path to achieving the FOMC’s goals. ... Our forecast for updated guidance is a close call, however, as the committee would want to avoid a tightening of financial conditions in light of the mixed inflation news. We would therefore expect the committee to indicate that the change in guidance is not meant to convey an expectation of an earlier liftoff than previously communicated, either in the statement itself or in Chair Yellen’s press conference.
An area of particular interest for the press conference will be any discussion of the post-liftoff guidance, as recent Fed communication has raised the prospect that views might be starting to shift away from the “shallow glide path.” Our forecast remains for the first hike in September 2015, followed by a steeper path of the funds rate than current market pricing.
The benchmark U.S. oil price slid 4.5% to $60.94 a barrel, the lowest level since July 2009 on the New York Mercantile Exchange. It was the biggest one-day drop since Nov. 28, the session that followed OPEC’s decision to maintain its oil-output target.
Brent crude, a gauge of global prices, fell 3.9%, or $2.60, to $64.24 a barrel, also the lowest since July 2009 on ICE Futures Europe.
Thanks to the spending bill that House and Senate leaders have negotiated, the federal government will avoid a shutdown. And that's great. Unfortunately, though, that’s the highest praise that can be attached to the deal.
Economists said the data suggested third-quarter consumer spending could be raised by at least two-tenths of a percentage point from a 2.2 percent annual rate when the government publishes its third estimate later this month.
That combined with data on wholesale inventories and construction spending could see third-quarter GDP revised up to a 4.4 percent annual pace from the 3.9 percent rate reported last month.
J.P. Morgan Chase said Wednesday it expected the QSS will lead to stronger estimates for spending, raising the GDP growth rate to 4.4% from an earlier prediction of 4.3%. Barclays raised its GDP prediction for the third quarter to 4.2% from 4.1%.
The U.S. Census Bureau announced today that the estimate of U.S. information sector revenue for the third calendar quarter of 2014, adjusted for seasonal variation but not for price changes, was $336.5 billion, an increase of 1.0 percent (± 0.8%) from the second quarter of 2014 and up 5.0 percent (± 0.8%) from the third quarter of 2013.
Nationwide, asking prices on for-sale homes jumped 1.5% month-over-month in November, seasonally adjusted — a surprisingly large increase. Future months will tell whether this was a blip or the beginning of a sustained climb. Year-over-year, asking prices rose 7.4%, down from the 10.3% year-over-year increase in November 2013. Asking prices rose year-over-year in 98 of the 100 largest U.S. metros — everywhere but Little Rock and New Haven.
Four of the 10 metros where asking prices rose most year-over-year were in Florida. These Sunshine State markets have older populations, and they all have a lower share of millennials than the national average of 21% and a higher share of baby boomers than the average of 24%. In fact, only one of the 10 markets with the largest price increases in November has a higher share of millennials than the national average—and only slightly (Las Vegas, at 22%).
Rents continued to climb. Nationwide, rents rose 6.1% year-over-year in November. Still, rent gains have cooled since August in 14 of the 25 largest rental markets, including the Northern California markets of San Francisco, Oakland, and Sacramento.
emphasis added
Federal Reserve officials are seriously considering an important shift in tone at their policy meeting next week: dropping an assurance that short-term interest rates will stay near zero for a “considerable time” as they look more confidently toward rate increases around the middle of next year.
Senior officials have hinted lately that they’re looking at dropping this closely watched interest-rate signal, which many market participants take as a sign rates won’t go up for at least six months.
There has been some interesting commentary lately in the business press about the desirability of risk insurance for companies as a protection against losses from a variety of hazards. But maybe the answer is investing in procurement...
There has been some interesting commentary lately in the business press about the desirability of risk insurance for companies as a protection against losses from a variety of hazards. For example, CFO Magazine recently touted the value of risk insurance. Other business-advisory sources mention buying insurance too as one of several risk-management strategies. Getting a risk-insurance policy is an interesting idea, but it occurs to me that firms already have a form of risk insurance: procurement.
Certainly, potential risks that could cause havoc abound. Commodity price spikes, supplier bankruptcies, catastrophic climate events such as hurricanes and tsunamis – they’re all among the major risks that businesses face and that procurement has to plan for to keep components and materials coming into their receiving departments so their production lines keep running. And, recent events remind everyone that political unrest is another major risk for businesses.
There have been nationwide protests in the US in the wake of the failure of a Ferguson, MO grand jury to indict a white police officer for killing a black teenager. Riots have disrupted businesses, especially in Ferguson itself. Countless retail shops, restaurants and other local establishments have burned or been looted, damaging the local economy. So far, at least, there has been little news of damage to the hundreds of manufacturing facilities in nearby St. Louis, but that is of little consolation. When human lives, and businesses of any kind, are damaged, the community is damaged too.
The unrest in Ferguson is but a small example of the type of political instability that holds risks for local businesses and the global economy. Hong Kong, China, Vietnam, Thailand, the Middle East, and parts of Africa and Latin America are experiencing or have recently experienced instability that ultimately can affect supply chains. And then, of course, there is Russia’s entrance into Ukraine. Consultancy McKinsey’s recent Economic Conditions Snapshot identified geopolitical instability as a top risk to global growth. In fact, McKinsey’s September’s survey was the third consecutive one in which executives most often cited political turmoil as a threat.
So, maybe buying risk insurance makes sense. But remember, the best insurance, at least when it comes to protecting your supply chain, is your own research and planning. Robert Monczka, consultant, author, former procurement executive, and professor emeritus at Michigan State University and Arizona State University, tells me that CPOs must be "constantly watching the uncertainty in the world, political and social, as well as changes in technology and the ways products are produced." The world doesn’t stand still, he says, and CPOs have to be ready to change their supplier networks quickly.
That kind of vigilance and agility may well be the most cost-effective risk insurance of all.
Borrowers with credit scores of 740 and up make up 55 percent of 2014 refinance originations, compared to just 29 percent in 2005
On the other hand, in 2005, 21 percent of refinance originations were to credit scores below 640; today that number is just 8 percent
Today’s purchase market is even more clearly separated; 56 percent of purchase originations were to credit scores of 740 and above, while just 2 percent went to borrowers with scores below 640
Over the past two and a half years, there has been a sustained and continual improvement in negative equity, from 33.5 percent of borrowers being underwater in January 2012 to less than eight percent today
Only 1.2 percent of active mortgages have current CLTVs of 150 percent or higher, down from 9.5 percent in January of 2012 (the bottom of the market in terms of national home prices)
While the overall share of underwater mortgages continues to decline, delinquency rates are increasing among the remaining negative equity mortgages
For the severely underwater – 150 percent or higher current CLTVs – over three out of every four borrowers (77 percent) are delinquent
OPEC’s biggest oil producer, Saudi Arabia, now believes oil prices could stabilize at around $60 a barrel, a level both it and other Gulf producers believe they could withstand, according to people familiar with the situation.
The shift in Saudi thinking suggests the de facto leader of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries won’t push for supply cuts in the near-term, even if oil prices fall further. Brent crude dropped 62 cents a barrel to $69.92 on Wednesday.
The U.S. Census Bureau of the Department of Commerce announced today that construction spending during October 2014 was estimated at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $971.0 billion, 1.1 percent above the revised September estimate of $960.3 billion.
Spending on private construction was at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $692.4 billion, 0.6 percent above the revised September estimate of $688.0 billion. Residential construction was at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $353.8 billion in October, 1.3 percent above the revised September estimate of $349.1 billion. Nonresidential construction was at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $338.6 billion in October, 0.1 percent below the revised September estimate of $338.9 billion. ...
In October, the estimated seasonally adjusted annual rate of public construction spending was $278.6 billion, 2.3 percent above the revised September estimate of $272.3 billion.
emphasis added
Driven by stronger sales and traffic and a more optimistic outlook among restaurant operators, the National Restaurant Association’s Restaurant Performance Index (RPI) posted a solid gain in October. The RPI – a monthly composite index that tracks the health of and outlook for the U.S. restaurant industry – stood at 102.8 in October, up 1.8 percent from its September level. In addition, the RPI stood above 100 for the 20th consecutive month, which signifies expansion in the index of key industry indicators.
“The positive same-store sales and customer traffic results suggest that restaurants are the beneficiaries of falling gas prices, which were down $0.88 since the end of June,” said Hudson Riehle, senior vice president of the Research and Knowledge Group for the Association. “Elevated food costs continue to top the list of challenges reported by restaurant operators, but overall they remain generally optimistic that business conditions will improve in the months ahead.”
emphasis added
Economic activity in the manufacturing sector expanded in November for the 18th consecutive month, and the overall economy grew for the 66th consecutive month, say the nation’s supply executives in the latest Manufacturing ISM® Report On Business®.
The report was issued today by Bradley J. Holcomb, CPSM, CPSD, chair of the Institute for Supply Management® (ISM®) Manufacturing Business Survey Committee. "The November PMI® registered 58.7 percent, a decrease of 0.3 percentage point from October’s reading of 59 percent, indicating continued expansion in manufacturing. The New Orders Index registered 66 percent, an increase of 0.2 percentage point from the reading of 65.8 percent in October. The Production Index registered 64.4 percent, 0.4 percentage point below the October reading of 64.8 percent. The Employment Index grew for the 17th consecutive month, registering 54.9 percent, a decrease of 0.6 percentage point below the October reading of 55.5 percent. Inventories of raw materials registered 51.5 percent, a decrease of 1 percentage point from the October reading of 52.5 percent. The Prices Index registered 44.5 percent, down 9 percentage points from the October reading of 53.5 percent, indicating lower raw materials prices in November relative to October. Comments from the panel are upbeat about strong demand and new orders, with some expressing concerns about West Coast port slowdowns and the threat of a potential dock strike."
emphasis added